• Firdha Uzhami SMK Budi Perkasa
  • Nurul Hasanah Fajaria
Keywords: Synetics techniques, vocabulary, acquisition


The research consists of two variables, namely the independent variable (Synectics Technique)
and the dependent variable (Vocabulary Acquisition). The purpose of this research is to find
out whether or not there is significant effect of synectics technique on students’ vocabulary
acquisition. This research was conducted on grade ten students of SMK Budi Perkasa Tambun
Selatan in academic year of 2017/2018. Research method used in this research was quasi
experimental, quantitative and the design was randomized post-test only control group design.
The analysis using SPSS-based One Way Anova Formula produced significance (Sig.) value
of 0.033. since the significance value was smaller than (<)0.05, Ho is rejected and HAis
accepted. (Fobserved)5.018 also showed that is higher than the critical value of (Ftable) (at the
significant level of 0.05 and df (1; 60)), namely 4.02. it can be concluded that Fobserved (5.018)
> Ftable (4.02). Accordingly the research concludes that there is significant effect of synectics
technique on grade ten students’ vocabulary acquisition at SMK Budi Perkasa Tambun Selatan
in the Academic Year of 2017-2018.


Bauer, L. (2001). Vocabulary. New York: Routledge.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching 4th Edition. New York:
The Free Press.
Ernidawati, T. &. (2017). The Effectiveness of Synectics Instructional Model on Foreign
Language Vocabulary Teaching. International Journal of Languages Education and
Teaching, 60-61.
Estes, H. M. (2010). Instruction : A Models Approach (6th ed). London, UK: Pearson
Frank, M. (1972). Modern English A Practical Reference Guide. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.


Garcia, M. (1989). Focus on Teaching : Approaches, Methods , Techniques. Manila: Rex
Book Store.
Gordon, W. (1961). Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity. New York, USA:
Hornby. (1995). How To Teach Vocabulary. Malaysia: Bluestone Press.
Jiangwen, W. a. (2013). The Role of Vocabulary in ESP Teaching and Learning. Chinese
Journal of Applied Linguistic, 1-15.
Joyce, B. W. (2009). Models of Teaching and Learning (8th edition). Boston: Allyn and
KEMENDIKBUD. (2017, May 31). PUSPENDIK. Retrieved from Kemendikbud:
Klein, W. (1994). Time in Language ( Germanic Linguistic ). Netherlands: Routledge.
Krashen. (2016). Essential Book Teacher Knowledge. New York: Pearson.
Ma, Y. &. (2015). A Study on The Relationship between English Comprehension and
English Vocabulary Knowledge. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Education
Research International, 1-15.
Milton, J. (2013). Measuring The Contribution of Vocabulary Knowledge to Proficiency in
The Four Skills. New Perspectives on Assessment and Corpus Analysis, 57-58.
Nemati, A. (2009). Memory Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Longterm Retention.
International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 14-24.
Nolan, V. &. (2016, June 20). Synectics as a Creative Problem Solving ( CPS ) System.
Retrieved from
Patil, R. (2012). Effectiveness of Synectics Model. Indian Streams Research Journal, 1-4.
Polat, B. &. (2017). The Effectiveness of Synectics Instructional Model on Foreign Language
Vocabulary Teaching. Asian Journal, 12.
Polat, E. &. (2017). The Effectiveness of Synectics Instructional Model on Foreign Language
Vocabulary Teaching. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching,
61 - 62.
Sanjaya, W. P. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan , Jenis, Metode dan Prosedur. Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Scout, T. (2002). How To Teach Vocabulary. London: Longman.
Siregar, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.
Sprenger, M. (2013). Teaching The Critical Vocabulary of The Common Core. Alexandria,
USA: Association for Suppervision & Curriculum Development.


Sugiyono, P. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Anggota
Ikatan Penerbit Indonesia (IKAPI).
Suyanto, K. (2010). English for Young Learners. Jakarta: BUMI AKSARA.