• Reza NA
  • Azizah NA
Keywords: Semantic Mapping Strategy, Vocabulary Learning Result, Vocabulary


This research entitled “The Effect of Semantic Mapping Strategy on Students’ Vocabulary Learning Resultat the Grade Ten of SMK Pusaka 1 in Academic Year of 2017/2018” principally aims to investigate whether or not Semantic Mapping Strategy significantly affects on Students’ Vocabulary Learning Result. The research samples were taken using cluster random sampling, with the total number of samples being 72 students. The location of this research was SMKPusaka 1 Jakarta. The research methodology adopted was true experimental method, with the research design being randomized post-test only control group design. To collect the data, the students were given objective test, numbering 30 items. The research data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. The findings indicated that there was significant difference of post-test score between the students who received Semantic Mapping Strategy and students who did not receive Semantic Mapping Strategy. It can be seen from the data analysis using ANOVA that showed Fobserved (7.801) is higher than the critical value of Ftable (at the significant level of 0.05 and df = 1/70), namely 3.96. It means that Semantic Mapping Strategy has significant effect on Students’ Vocabulary Learning Result.


Abdelrahman, O. M. (2013, July). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Semantic Mapping on EFL Learners' Awareness of Vocabulary Knowledge at Al Imam Mohammed Ibin Saud Islamic University. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, II(7), 722-731.

Abdulrahman, T. R. (2016). Edmodo as a Supplementary Teaching in EAP Classroom: Perception and Reality. The Bandung International Conference on Language and Education (pp. 39-50). Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Abdulrahman, T. (2016). TED Talks as Listening Teaching Strategy in EAP Classroom. The Asian EFL Journal Second Language Acquisition – Academic Research, 72-93.

Amminuddin. (2001). Semantik : Pengantar Studi Tentang Makna. Malang: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Anderson; Krathwohl;. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Now York: Longman.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitia Suatu Pendekatan Praktik Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta.

Basri, H. (2013). Landasan Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Pusaka Setia.

Bauer, L. (2001). Vocabulary : Language Workbooks. (R. Hudson, Ed.) London: Routledge.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle : An Interactive Approach to Language Pedegogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Dilek, Yesim; Yuruk, Nurcihan. (2012). Using Semantic Mapping Technique in Vocabulary Teaching at Pre-intermediate Level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences(70), 1531-1544.

Dimyati; Mudjiono;. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Flanigan, Kevin; Greenwood, Scott C;. (2007). Effective Content Vocabulary Instruction in The Middle : Matching Students, Purposes, Words and Strategies. Iinternational Reading Association, 226-238. doi:101598

Gaut, R. (2002). Semantic Mapping Technique. New York: Prentice Hall.

Huyen. (2003). Learning Vocabulary through Games: The Effectiveness of Learning Vocabulary through Games. Asian EFL Journal. Retrieved from http:/

Johnson, Burke; Chritensen, Larry;. (2008). Educational Research : Quantitative, Qualitative and Mix Approaches Third Edition. California, United States of America: Sage Publication, Inc.

Kaufhold, J. A. (2002). The Psychology of Learning and The Art of Teaching . New York: Writers Club Press.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. (2016). Silabus Mata Pelajaran. Silabus Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. (2017). Hasil Ujian Nasional. Retrieved from Puspendik:

Khoii, R; Sharififar, S;. (2013). Memorization versus semantic in second language vocabulary acquisition. ELT(2), 67.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 2nd Edition. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.

Kreidler, C. W. (2002). Introducing English Semantic. New York: the Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Nation, I. S. (2000). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language.

Nickols, F. (2016). Strategy: Definition and Meaning. 1-13.

Nisfiannoor, M. (2009). Pendekatan Statistika Moderen untuk Ilmu Sosial. (A. N. Dini, Ed.) Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Norbert, S. (2000). Vocabulary in English Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Rather, A. R. (2004). Psychology of Learning and Development . New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.

Santoso, S. (2010). Statistik Multivariat : Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Takac, V. P. (2008). Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Foreign Language Acquisition. Dublin: the Cromwell Press Ltd.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. London: Longman.

Zahedi, Yagoub; Abdi, Mortaza;. (2012). The Effect of Semantic Mapping Strategy on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology(69), 2273-2280.